U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Pittman

United States v. Pittman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1999

United States v. Pittman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

SHONTAYNE DWAYNE PITTMAN, a/k/a Light, a/k/a Wayne, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-97-5, CA-98-113-4-F)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shontayne Dwayne Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Shontayne Dwayne Pittman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pittman, Nos. CR-97-5; CA-98-113-4-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.