U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Arthur

United States v. Arthur
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1999

United States v. Arthur

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TERRY KEITH ARTHUR, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-88-178, CA-97-562-6)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Keith Arthur, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Terry Keith Arthur appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. Arthur, Nos. CR-88-178; CA-97- 562-6 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.