U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Meyer v. Lanham

Meyer v. Lanham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1999

Meyer v. Lanham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7459

GENE THOMAS MEYER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner, Division of Corrections; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attor- ney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 98-1692-S)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry J. Becker, Bowie, Maryland; Fred Warren Bennett, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Meyer v. Lanham, No. CA-98-1692-S (D.

Md. Sept. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.