U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Chavis

United States v. Chavis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 1999

United States v. Chavis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7550

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HORACE CHAVIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-87-61-F, CA-97-314-5-F)

Submitted: May 7, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Horace Chavis, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Horace Chavis seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Chavis, Nos. CR-87-61-F; CA-97-314-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.