U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Nastari v. United States

Nastari v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 1999

Nastari v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6152

JOHN NASTARI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-924-BO-5)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Nastari, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Nastari appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nastari v.United States, No. CA-98-924-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1999). We deny Nastari’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.