U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Stanton v. Wood

Stanton v. Wood
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 25, 1999

Stanton v. Wood

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6328

MARK STEVEN STANTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LOWELL WOOD, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-889-5-H)

Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: May 25, 1999

Before HAMILTON and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Steven Stanton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Mark Steven Stanton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stanton v. Wood, No. CA-98-889-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.