U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Nance

United States v. Nance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 1999

United States v. Nance

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-92-135, CA-99-6)

Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lawrence Nance seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Request for Reconsideration, or Alternatively, Motion to Re-open Section 2255.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Nance, Nos. CR-92-135; CA-99-6 (W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.