U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Merrill v. Computer Dynamics

Merrill v. Computer Dynamics
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 1999

Merrill v. Computer Dynamics

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1793

In Re: COMPUTER DYNAMICS, INCORPORATED, Debtor. _________________________

STEPHEN GARY MERRILL, Creditor - Appellant, versus

ROBERT STARER, Operating Officer of CDI, Incorporated, Debtor - Appellee, versus

U. S. TRUSTEE, Party-in-interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-1086-2, BK-95-23127-A)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Francis Halloran, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant.

Michael Patrick Cotter, VANDEVENTER BLACK, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Stephen Gary Merrill appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders: (1) imposing sanctions against him pursuant to Bankr. R. 9011, and (2) granting in part, and denying in part, the Appellee’s motion to strike the designa- tion of the record on appeal. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Merrill v. Starer, Nos. CA-97-1086-2; BK-95-23127-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.