Alday v. Tecphy Division
Alday v. Tecphy Division
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2150
JAMES D. ALDAY; LORRI ALDAY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus
TECPHY DIVISION FIRMINY, Defendant - Appellee, and
FORTECH, INCORPORATED; C. H. POWELL COMPANY, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2356-2-18)
Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: June 9, 1999
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julian H. Toporek, Savannah, Georgia, for Appellants. Robert H.
Brunson, Courtney A. Crook, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: James and Lorri Alday appeal the district court’s order grant- ing Appellee summary judgment in this diversity personal injury action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alday v. Tecphy Division Firminy, No. CA-97-2356-2-18 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.