U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Heilman v. Connaught Developmen

Heilman v. Connaught Developmen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 7, 1999

Heilman v. Connaught Developmen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2799

DAVID L. HEILMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

TAX CERTIFICATE REDEMPTIONS, INCORPORATED; LMG PROPTERTIES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs, versus

CONNAUGHT DEVELOPMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-435-5-F, BK-94-353-5-ATS)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 7, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Heilman, Appellant Pro Se. David Warren Boone, BURNS, DAY & PRESNELL, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: David Heilman appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order avoiding a lien and imposing sanctions against him, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Heilman v. Connaught Developments, Inc., Nos. CA-98-435-5-F; BK-94-353-5-ATS (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21 & Nov. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the district court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.