U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Young v. Casey

Young v. Casey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1999

Young v. Casey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6550

ROGER D. YOUNG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PATRICK T. CASEY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-469-3-V)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger D. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Roger D. Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Young v. Casey, CA-96-469-3-V (W.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.