United States v. Kaiser Jones
United States v. Kaiser Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
KAISER CORNELIUS JONES, a/k/a Kazere Lewis Jones, a/k/a Kyzere Jones, a/k/a Cornelius K.
Jones, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-147)
Submitted: June 8, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Esther J. Windmueller, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F.
Fahey, United States Attorney, Stephen W. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Kaiser Cornelius Jones appeals his conviction, pursuant to a conditional guilty plea, for possession or a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 1999). Jones re- served in is plea agreement the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Finding no error, we affirm. We agree with the district court’s conclusion that the police officers who seized a firearm from Jones’s person following a stop and frisk and protective search possessed “specific and articulable facts prompting a reasonable suspicion that the defen- dant Jones engaged in criminal activity and was armed and danger- ous.” Therefore, there was no constitutional violation. See United States v. King, 119 F.3d 290 (4th Cir. 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions of the par- ties are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.