U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Bruce

United States v. Bruce
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1999

United States v. Bruce

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ROBERT LEE BRUCE, JR., a/k/a Rob Base, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-94-61, CA-98-39-R)

Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Bruce, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Robert Lee Bruce, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opin- ion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See United States v. Bruce, Nos. CR- 94-61; CA-98-39-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 27 & Sept. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.