U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Peery v. Plaster

Peery v. Plaster
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1999

Peery v. Plaster

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6395

DONALD WAYNE PEERY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

HAROLD PLASTER, Sheriff, Pittsylvania Co.; GWEN YARBROUGH; EVA REYNOLDS; JOHN DOE, Psychiatrist, Pittsylvania Co. Mental Health, Danville, VA; JANE DOE, Intake Officer, Pittsylvania Co. Mental Health, Danville, VA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-89)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Wayne Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Donald W. Peery, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1999) without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Peery v. Plaster, No. CA-99-89 (W.D. Va. Mar. 10, 1999). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.