U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Facundo v. Henry

Facundo v. Henry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1999

Facundo v. Henry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6349

ENRIQUE FACUNDO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MARK A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3385-MJG)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Enrique Facundo, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Enrique Facundo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Facundo v. Henry, No. CA- 98-3385-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 10 & Mar. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.