U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Watson

United States v. Watson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 24, 1999

United States v. Watson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JERRY LEE WATSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-143, CA-96-3243-6-20AK)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Thomas Stepp, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Green- ville, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Corley Lucius, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-92- 143; CA-96-3243-6-20AK (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.