U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Langworthy v. Dean

Langworthy v. Dean
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 24, 1999

Langworthy v. Dean

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1404

JOHN A. LANGWORTHY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ROBERT L. DEAN; RICHARD P. CRANE; SUE DUDLEY; DOUGLAS M. DUNCAN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-2631-AW)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Langworthy, Appellant Pro Se. Maureen Mullen Dove, Assis- tant Attorney General, Elisabeth Ann Sachs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Wellington Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, Sharon Veronica Burrell, Joanne Robertson, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Langworthy appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Langworthy v. Dean, No. CA-98-2631-AW (D. Md. Mar. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.