UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6232

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CLAY MARSHALL CURTIS, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 99-6299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CLAY MARSHALL CURTIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-21, CA-97-191-R)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clay Marshall Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Clay Marshall Curtis challenges the district court’s orders denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) and his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Curtis, Nos. CR-93-21; CA-97-191-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 5 & Feb. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED