U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Kitayatuthelezi v. Martin

Kitayatuthelezi v. Martin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 1999

Kitayatuthelezi v. Martin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6474

SHADRECK ABDUL BASHSHAR KITAYATUTHELEZI, a/k/a Norman Hayes, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIAM MARTIN, Lieutenant; ROBERT T. PORSCHE, Sergeant; KENNETH MANIGO, Sergeant; KEVIN TAYLOR, Officer; EDWARD SHROPSHIRE, Officer; BLOCKER, Correctional Officer; HENRY BRUNSON, Officer; SANDY STANLEY, Nurse; JANE DOE, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-953-4-12BC)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shadreck Abdul Bashshar Kitayatuthelezi, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Colum- bia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Shadreck Abdul Bashshar Kitayatuthelezi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kitayatuthelezi v. Martin, No. CA-98-953-4-12BC (Mar. l8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.