U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Barrett v. Sykes

Barrett v. Sykes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 1999

Barrett v. Sykes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6484

JAMES BARRETT, III, BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ABDUR RAHMAN Y. SYKES; JEAN JOYNER; RANDALL LEE; JAMES C. WILSON; EDWARD A. JACKSON; MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; CHARLES K.

STEWART; HATTIE PIMPONG; JOHNNY W. TAYLOR, III; HAROLD PERSON; WADE L. MOSELEY; ROBERT R. NOWELL; HENRY D. GREGORY; OLIVER S. MUHAMMAD, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-54)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Barrett, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Barrett, III, appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barrett v. Sykes, No. CA-99-54 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 1999). We further deny Barrett’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.