United States v. Cephas
United States v. Cephas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-4801
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES W. CEPHAS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-97-32)
Submitted: June 1, 1999 Decided: July 9, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
B. Craig Manford, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. David E. Godwin, United States Attorney, Thomas O. Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: A jury convicted James W. Cephas on one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994) and ten counts of dis- tribution of crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). Cephas was subsequently sentenced to two concurrent sen- tences of 97 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Cephas claims that the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion for judg- ment of acquittal on the conspiracy conviction based on insuf- ficient evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs and appendix and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm Cephas’ convictions and sen- tences. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.