U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Fitzgerald v. Dr. Frye

Fitzgerald v. Dr. Frye
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 15, 1999

Fitzgerald v. Dr. Frye

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6495

JAMES H. FITZGERALD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DR. FRYE, Chief Physician of the Chesterfield County Jail; MEDICAL STAFF, “Unknown Nurses” of the Chesterfield County Jail; NATIVIDAD STOVER, M.D.; MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, “John Doe, Unknown Medical Intern,” Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-598-AM)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Fitzgerald, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Lynne J. Fiscella, LAW OFFICE OF COTTER, FISCELLA & MCCONNELL, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James H. Fitzgerald, Sr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the dis- trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fitzgerald v. Frye, No. CA-98-598-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.