United States v. Frazier
United States v. Frazier
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7265
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CHARLES RAY FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-92-46-V, CA-96-11-2-V)
Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Ray Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Charles Ray Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Frazier, Nos. CR-92-46-V; CA-96-11-2-V (W.D.N.C. June 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.