U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Crawford

United States v. Crawford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 14, 1999

United States v. Crawford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

VERN ODELL CRAWFORD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-70108, CA-99-61-7)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vern Odell Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Vern Odell Crawford seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crawford, Nos. CR-95- 70108; CA-99-61-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.