U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Gilley v. Hunt

Gilley v. Hunt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 14, 1999

Gilley v. Hunt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6339

RAYMOND FREDERICK GILLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JAMES B. HUNT; MACK JARVIS; CHARLES G.

STEVENS; JAMES PIERCE; JOSEPH LOFTIS; CLYDE MORRIS; C. LOWNES, Doctor; DONNIE CHANDLER; CHERYL SMITH; D. DANIELS; R. PRICE; D. DAIL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1274-1)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Frederick Gilley, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Raymond Frederick Gilley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gilley v. Hunt, No. CA-97-1274-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.