U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Keating

United States v. Keating
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 1999

United States v. Keating

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7276

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-66-N)

Submitted: July 6, 1999 Decided: July 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Keating, No. CR-93-66-N (E.D. Va Aug. 7, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.