U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

In Re: Winters v.

In Re: Winters v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 19, 1999

In Re: Winters v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1101

In Re: JOHN WESLEY WINTERS, JR., Debtor. _________________________

JOHN WESLEY WINTERS, JR., Debtor - Appellant.

No. 99-1103

In Re: JOHN WESLEY WINTERS, JR., Debtor. _________________________

JOHN WESLEY WINTERS, JR., Debtor - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-609-5-BO, BK-97-1616-5-ATS, CA-98-24-5-BO)

Submitted: June 22, 1999 Decided: July 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wesley Winters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Wesley Winters, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that Winters must pay the filing fees and denying his motion for stay pending appeal (No. 99-1101), and denying as moot Winters’ motions for stay of foreclosure pending appeal (No. 99-1103). We have reviewed the records on appeal and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See In re: Winters, No. CA-98-609-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 1998); In re: Winters, No. CA-98-24-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan.

12, 1999*). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 11, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 12, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.