U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

McSwain v. Huffman

McSwain v. Huffman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 1999

McSwain v. Huffman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2757

LARRY DEAN MCSWAIN; ELENORA MCSWAIN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

DAVID HUFFMAN; KERRY HAYER; TRENT DAVIS; JOHN DOE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Carl Horn, III, Chief Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-120-5-H)

Submitted: July 6, 1999 Decided: July 29, 1999

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Dean McSwain, Elenora McSwain, Appellants Pro Se. Tyrus Vance Dahl, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Larry Dean McSwain and Elenora McSwain appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on the McSwains’ 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) action. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McSwain v. Huffman, No. CA-97-120-5-H (W.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.