U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Ford

United States v. Ford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 1999

United States v. Ford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6618

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES ROBERT FORD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-90-89, CA-98-444)

Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Robert Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Robert Ford seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny in forma pauperis status, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-90-89; CA-98-444 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.