U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Mills v. Lanham

Mills v. Lanham
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 1999

Mills v. Lanham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7656

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RICHARD LANHAM, State of Maryland Department of Corrections; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ADJUST- MENT CENTER; PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 97-3032-DKC)

Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Albert Curtis Mills appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Lanham, No. CA-97-3032-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.