U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Kimberlin v. Dewalt

Kimberlin v. Dewalt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 1999

Kimberlin v. Dewalt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6581

BRETT C. KIMBERLIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden of the Federal Cor- rectional Institute at Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-98-957-2)

Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommen- dation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kimberlin v. Dewalt, No. CA-98-957-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.