United States v. Guay
United States v. Guay
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6862
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CLAUDE JOSEPH GUAY; DANIEL GUAY, Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-11-D)
Submitted: March 23, 1999 Decided: August 3, 1999
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Timothy Williams, WILLIAMS, MORRISON, LIGHT & MOREAU, Dan- ville, Virginia, for Appellants. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Joseph W. H. Mott, Assistant United States At- torney, Steven Speakman, Third Year Law Intern, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Claude Joseph Guay and Daniel Guay appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for a new trial. The motion was made following this court’s earlier remand of the Guays’ direct appeal to allow counsel for the Guays to examine a redacted U.S. Customs investigative report. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s hearing on this matter and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.