U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Woodson v. Warden of Haynesvill

Woodson v. Warden of Haynesvill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1999

Woodson v. Warden of Haynesvill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6771

WILLIE DANIEL WOODSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

WARDEN OF HAYNESVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-263-A)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Daniel Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, As- sistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Willie Daniel Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodson v. Warden of Haynesville Correctional Ctr., No. CA-99-263-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.