U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Barnes v. NC Attorney General

Barnes v. NC Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1999

Barnes v. NC Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6396

CATHY ANN MILLS BARNES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; CAROL CALDWELL, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-374-1)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John David Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS, WHEELER & HAUSER, High Point, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Cathy Ann Mills Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnes v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-98-374-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.