U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Fleming v. Prince Georges

Fleming v. Prince Georges
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 10, 1999

Fleming v. Prince Georges

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1448

STEVEN PAUL FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND; PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, Courthouse, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3624-MJG)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 10, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying Fleming’s motion to reopen his civil action and declining to extend the time in which to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fleming v. Prince Georges County, No. CA-98-3624-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.