Baker v. Runyon
Baker v. Runyon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1340
PATRICIA D. BAKER, a resident of Wake County, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-476-5-F)
Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 10, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia D. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Patricia Baker appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in her action filed under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v. Runyon, No. CA-97-476-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.