Renoir v. Miller
Renoir v. Miller
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6862
PIERRE A. RENOIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
KAREN MILLER, M.D.; ROANOKE CITY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-330-7)
Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Pierre Renoir appeals a district court order denying his mo- tion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.