U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Caprood v. Moore

Caprood v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1999

Caprood v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6792

ROBERT J. CAPROOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; WILLIAM D. CATOE; LAURIE F.

BESSINGER; THOMAS MCCANTS; VAUGHN JACKSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-603-22)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Caprood, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert Caprood appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Caprood v. Moore, No. CA-98-603-22 (D.S.C. May 27, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.