U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Crawford v. Messitte

Crawford v. Messitte
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 1999

Crawford v. Messitte

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1070

JOE D. CRAWFORD, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PETER J. MESSITTE, U. S. District Judge; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the Southern District of Maryland, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3309-AW)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe D. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Joe D. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crawford v. Messitte, No. CA-98-3309-AW (D. Md. Dec. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.