U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Lambert v. NC State Bar

Lambert v. NC State Bar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 1999

Lambert v. NC State Bar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1648

ANTHONY LAMBERT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-71-2-BO)

Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: September 2, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Douglas James Brocker, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action for failing to properly serve process on Defendant. We have reviewed the record and, although we find no reversible error, dismissal of the action should have been without prejudice. See 5A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1353, at 280 (2d ed. 1990); Umbenhauer v. Woog, 969 F.2d 25, 30 n.6 (3d Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.