U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Bannerman

United States v. Bannerman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 31, 1999

United States v. Bannerman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FRANKLYN EARL BANNERMAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-90-105-N, CA-97-287-2)

Submitted: August 10, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia; Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Franklyn Earl Bannerman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bannerman, No. CR-90-105-N; CA-97-287-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.