United States v. Adams
United States v. Adams
Opinion
Filed: August 30, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6310 (CR-91-291, CA-98-3552-1-6)
United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
Charles Jerome Adams, Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed June 24, 1999, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3 -- the district court numbers are corrected to read “(CR-91-291, CA-98-3552-1-6).”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6310
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CHARLES JEROME ADAMS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-291, CA-98-3552-1-6)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Charles Jerome Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Adams, No. CR-91-291 (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.