U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Trader

United States v. Trader
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 9, 1999

United States v. Trader

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7785

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

NED TRADER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-368, CA-97-774-B)

Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 9, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ned Trader, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ned Trader seeks to appeal an order denying his motion to re- consider following the district court’s denial of Trader’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Trader, Nos. CR-93-368, CA-97-774-B (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1998). We also deny Trader’s motion for appointment of appellate counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.