United States v. Jackie Messer
United States v. Jackie Messer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6383
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JACKIE EDWARD MESSER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-88-95, CA-95-172-V)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: September 9, 1999
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackie Edward Messer, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Jackie Edward Messer appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Messer, No. CR-88-95 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 1999). We deny Messer’s motion for summary remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.