United States v. Glenn
United States v. Glenn
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6779
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GREGORY GLENN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-780, CA-97-4028-6-13)
Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 15, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Glenn Yarborough, III, ASHMORE & YARBOROUGH, P.A., Green- ville, South Carolina, for Appellant. E. Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gregory Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1999).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. Glenn, Nos. CR-96-780; CA-97-
4028-6-13 (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 5, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 6, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished