Henson v. Hawk
Henson v. Hawk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6764
PAUL ANDREW HENSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
KATHLEEN M. HAWK; J. R. JAMES, Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-99-213-1)
Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 15, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Andrew Henson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Paul Andrew Henson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion affirming the order of
the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Henson v. Hawk, No. CA-99-213-1
(M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished