United States v. Ham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6442

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SOLOMAN HAM,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-2)

Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Marcus John Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Soloman Ham appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Ham, No. CA-97-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 1999). We deny

Ham’s motion for general relief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished