Glidden v. Commissioner SSA
Glidden v. Commissioner SSA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1708
ROGER C. GLIDDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-131-2)
Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger C. Glidden, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph L. Brinkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Roger Glidden appeals the district court’s order affirming the decision of the Commisioner of the Social Security Administration that Glidden is receiving proper social security retirement bene- fits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. See Glidden v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, No. CA-98-131-2 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.