U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Wheelous v. Garraghty

Wheelous v. Garraghty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 13, 1999

Wheelous v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6279

DAMON LOUIS WHEELOUS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-444-2)

Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: September 13, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Louis Wheelous, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wheelous v. Garraghty, No. CA-97-444-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.