U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Colodney v. Sussman

Colodney v. Sussman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 13, 1999

Colodney v. Sussman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1611

NATHAN J. COLODNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LORI L. SUSSMAN, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1609-A)

Submitted: June 30, 1999 Decided: September 13, 1999

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan J. Colodney, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Dianne Regenhardt, GARY & GOODMAN, LTD., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Nathan J. Colodney appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing his civil diversity action for improper venue. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Colodney v. Sussman, No. CA-98-1609-A (E.D.

Va. Apr. 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.